Did Yazeed treat the women from Ahl'ul bayt (as) with respect and treat them as guests?
Azam Tariq could have us believe that:
Kr-hcy.com states:THEN HE ACCORDED A VERY GRACIOUS HOSPITALITY TO THE REMAINING FAMILY MEMBERS OF HAZRAT HUSAYN AND ARRANGED THEIR RETURN JOURNEY TO MADINAH WITH GREAT HONOUR AND RESPECT.
HAD YAZID GOT ANY INVOLVEMENT IN THE MURDER OF HADHRAT HUSAYN THE REMANANTS OF HIS FAMILY WOULD HAVE NEVER STAYED WITH YAZID AS HIS GUESTS FOR SEVERAL DAYS IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE INCIDENT OF KARBALA. HOW CAN ONE STAY AND DINE WITH THE MURDERERS OF ONE'S BLOOD RELATIONS? ALL THE VILE PROPAGANDA AGAINST YAZID IS A LATTER INNOVATION OF THE SHIAS.
What hospitality! Perhaps we are not up to date with Nasibi etiquettes, but would the reasonable man deem the act of parading of women in ropes before Yazeed, without scarves to be an act of honour and respect. These women did not happily visit Yazeed whilst on holiday, Yazeed's army had slaughtered their men folk and they had entered the court as prisoners not guests. Even inside the court Yazeed showed his hospitality by rowing with Sayyida Zeyneb and argued with her. Is this how guests are respected when they visit friends? See how this nasibi, the biggest one in Pakistan, Azam Tariq, twists basic facts to make it seem like a tea party. He calls prisoners of war 'guests of the khalifa' on the basis of thei having been in his palace. Yes, roped, chained and in the dungeon! The rest about meals with the khalifa is all lies...there is no basis for it in any textual source. In fact these sources all testify to the fact that Yazeed had their hijab torn off them.
The women appeared before Yazeed without purdah and yet 'dear hospitable Yazeed' the prima Donna Santa Claus failed to address this issue. Is this how honour and respected was afforded to the grand daughters of Rasulullah (s)? Ibn Katheer states in al Bidaya Volume 8 page 204 as follows:
"If he [Yazeed] was embarrassed [by the killing of Imam Husayn] then why did he not arrange for the women's purdah when they appeared without any covering? Some supporters of Yazeed state that he respected the women [treated them well] when the reality is, in regards to his treatment of the women of Husayn's household, efforts were made to make Yazeed aware that the grand daughters of Rasulullah (s) were without Purdah, whilst his own Servant women were in Purdah [i.e. he humiliated them further]".
Was Yazeed related to Imam Hussain[as] via marriage?The Nasibi liar says:
Kr-hcy.com states:THIS IS HIGHLY MISLEADING AS IT MAY BE MENTIONED HERE THE CLOSE AFFINITY OF YAZID WITH THE FAMILY OF HADHRAT ALI. IN 53 H WHEN YAZID AS AMIR-UL-HUJJAJ WENT TO MAKKAH AND AFTER HAJ REACHED MADINAH, AT THAT OCCASION HE WAS MARRIED TO SAYYEDA UMM HUHAMMAD, THE DAUGHTER OF ABDULLAH BIN JAFFAR YAHYAR WHO WAS THE SON-IN-LAW OF HADHRAT ALI AND BROTHER-IN-LAW OF HASAN AND HUSAYN.
Our challenge is to this Nasibi to substantiate this claim. Produce us an authentic text, with a complete chain proving this alleged marriage. Also, did Yazeed or any members of the Ahl'ul bayt (as) mention that they were related to Yazeed via marriage? Can Azam Tariq produce even a single source wherein Yazeed had stated that he was the brother in law of Imam Husayn (as)? What is astonishing is the way in which Azam Tariq just makes up historical facts with no textual basis. And he spurts them out with such confidence. This man, who is clearly a pathological liar, is the leader of the Wahabis in Pakistan...it is shocking.
Adapted from the book: "Yazeed"
Share this article