A Glance at the Concocted Traditions
It is an indisputable fact of Islam that a noble man of the highest caliber, from the progeny of the Holy Prophet (S.A.) and offspring of Hazrat Fatema Zahra (S.A.) will appear in the last era of the world, defunct religion, establish justice and equity and purge the world from all evils. All the sects of Islam unanimously agree that this major upheaval will be known as the Revolution of Mahdi. Verily the Sunni traditionalists have adorned and embellished their books with the detailed narration of this glorious revolution. Of course there is a difference of opinion in their view point regarding his pedigree like some say that he is the immediate son and successor of Imam Hasan Askari (A.S.), while others opine that he is from the offspring of Imam Hasan al- Mujtaba (A.S.), still others think that he is from the generation of Imam Husain (A.S.). There are a few who falter that he will belong to Abbasid lineage. Some of them believe that he was born in 255 A.H. and others are adamant that he is yet to take birth.
Some predict that he will reappear from Holy Mecca, while some forecast that he will arrive from Khurasan there are also some who assert that he will rise from the far west. There are some pedantic scholars who out of their shallow and scant knowledge arbitrated that Mahdi and Hazrat Isa (A.S.) are one and the same person. Precisely speaking according to them, Mahdi is none else but Hazrat Isa (A.S.).
Such different and discordant narrations have stemmed from those contradictory traditions which are recorded in various books. It is deplorable, indeed such fabricated and concocted traditions have slowly and gradually penetrated into the books of Ahle-Sunnat traditionalists. From the historical view point it is evident that such traditions were fabricated by those imposters who claimed to be Mahdi and have attracted hordes of naive followers. Some of the renowned Sunni scholars and traditionalists have admitted to the rampant fabrication of traditions in their books viz Ibn Jauzi in Al-Mauzooaat, Zahabi in Meezanul Etedaal, Ibn Araq in Al-Ahadithuz-Zaeefa wal-Mauzooah.
In this brief article, such concocted and fabricated traditions will be discussed, their authenticity scrutinized and their truth exposed.
1. Ibn Majah Qazveeni in his Sahih narrates from Anas bin Malik who relates from the. Holy Prophet (S.A.) that : Mahdi is none else but Jesus, the son of Mary.
Which purports that the Mahdi of Islam is Hazrat Isa (A.S.). None of the scholars of Ahle-Sunnat have accepted this concept (that Isa is Mahdi) because this tradition contradicts various other traditions of the Holy Prophet (S.A.) which are authentic and continuous. Particularly those traditions in which the Holy Prophet (S.A.) has said that He will be from my progeny and from the offspring of Fatema (S.A.). The noted celebrity of Ahle-Sunnat, Imam Qurtubbi (exp. 671 A.H.) in his famous exegesis of Quran i.e. At-Tazkera fi Umuril Akhera has declared that it is a weak tradition because in the reliable traditions of the Holy Prophet (S.A.) it is clearly mentioned that he will be from his own lineage, from the children of Fatema (S.A.). These traditions are much more authentic and reliable than the one in question. Hence the verdict will be based on the most authentic traditions rather than the weaker ones. Such objections are raised by other Sunni stalwarts too. Like Ibn Qayyim in fiftieth chapter of Al-MunarAl-MunifFil-Hadith As-Sahih waz-Zaeef. And according to Baihaqi, the narrators of this tradition are unknown or unreliable.Also the sequence of tradition is not consistent but is lost from some where in between. This tradition is one of the single reports of Mohammad bin Khalid Junaidi. Zahabi in his Meezanul-Etedaal in third volume, Pg. No. 535 has decisively stated that Mohammad bin Khalid is an unknown narrator and the traditions related by him are not acceptable. More or less similar thing is indicted by another great scholar Abul HasanAaburi in Manaqibush-Shafei.
However the unreliability of narrators and incorrect contents of the traditions prove that it is a spurious tradition. But despite all such inherent weaknesses some of the Sunni scholars like Ibn Kathir and Qurtubbi have made efforts to prove it a correct tradition by whimsical interpretations and fragile justifications.
They have asserted that the Mahdi does not imply a particular person but it is used in its literal sense which means guided. Thus Hazrat Isa (A.S.) is the best guided person though this meaning is not correct in itself. Those things which are pertinent to this tradition like the events and conditions of last era, commotion and distraught which will be ubiquitous refute this justification were given in order to maintain the credibility of the book i.e. Sunane-Ibn Majah because it is claimed that all the traditions in the book are correct and authentic.
2. Ibn Asakir from the third Caliph Usman bin Affaan and he had related from the Holy Prophet (S.A.) that :
The Mahdi is from the progeny of my uncle Abbas, means Mahdi will be from Bani Abbas. In this context Hafiz Mohibuddeen Tabari in his Zak-haerul-Uqba Pg. 206 has quoted on the authority of Hafiz Sahmi, who quoted from Ibn Abbas who related from Holy Prophet (S.A.) that: Once the Holy Prophet (S.A.) addressed him thus :
Mahdi will be from your offspring who will disseminate guidance and quell deviations. Allah the Almighty commenced His religion from me and will culminate it on your progeny.
Muhibuddeen Tabari has quoted two more traditions from Abu Huraira and from Abdus-Samad of similar contents. Besides this, Abul Faraj Isfahan! has quoted from a courtier scholar of Bani Abbas namely Qati bin Abbas in his book Al-Aghani(Vol. 12, Pg. 81), a tradition ascribed to Holy Prophet (S.A.) without mentioning the chain of narrators.
All these traditions are supporting the notion that Hazrat Mahdi (A.S.) will be from the lineage of Abbas, the uncle of the Holy Prophet (S.A.). In other terms he will be from Bani Abbas. But if a person is scantily aware of the traditions of the Holy Prophet (S.A.) in this regard then he can infer on his own that it is a concocted and an unscrupulously fabricated tradition. Such few traditions are starkly contradictory to those authentic and continuous traditions which abound the books of traditions. Such as :
Mahdi will descend from my lineage from the offspring of Fatema.
It was this reason that such a great Sunni scholar like Dar Qutni has objected to the former tradition and thus commented :
This is a weird and queer tradition related only by the slave of Bani Hashim namely Mohammad bin Walid.
As it was hinted earlier that historically these were the product of claimants to attract the laymen towards themselves and gain their sympathies. As a further step they entitled Mohammad bin Abdullah bin Ali as Mahdi. They distorted the religion of Holy Prophet (S.A.) for their greed of rule for few days in this transient world. Qazi Luqman bin Mohammad has hinted towards such heinous vices of Bani Abbas in his eulogy.
The time when gems were compared to their like. Similarly Mohammad bin Abdullah was entitled as Mahdi.This Mohammad bin Abdullah bin Ali Abbasi is a wretched transgressor. If mere similarity in names was sufficient then every man named as Ahmedwould have been a Prophet. Alas! every name is not like its named ones. And ig-norance made them dumb and blind .
This is not the only attempt to dupe and deceive the common populace but there are numerous such instances which are cited over here.
3. Tirmizi in his Sahih has quoted from Zaeda, he narrated from Aasem and in turn he quoted from Zar, who narrated it from Abdullah bin Masud who related from the Holy Prophet (S.A.) that :
If a solitary day is left from the eve of doomsday then Allah will prolong that day to such an extent that a man from my progeny will rise. Whose name will be my name and his fathers name will be my fathers name. He will fill the world with justice and equity as it would be filled with injustice and oppression.
The contents of this tradition are continuous and reliable according to Shia and Sunni scholars. It has been narrated in various ways.
The thing which has made this narration of Tirmizi skeptical are those words which are not quoted in other authentic hooks. In other books the phrase of his fathers name is the same as my fathers, is not recorded they all have recorded only his name will be same as mine.
This doubt holds ground when we notice the name of Zaeda in the chain of narrators, which according to Sunni scholars of Rejal is not reliable and adds more words in the concept of traditions. Because that chain of narrators where Zaedas name is not there and only namesof Aasem, Zar, Abdullah bin Masud are mentioned then addition of his fathers name is same as that of my father is not seen. But all have sufficed upto his name will be same as mine.This point requires special attention that Tirmizi whose book is enumerated among Sehah Sittah has narrated the same tradition elsewhere but has not narrated this addition (i.e. his fathers name will be my fathers name) over there . Similarly in the ranks of traditionalists Ahmed bin Hanbal is accorded precedence over Ibn Majah. Ahmed ibn Hanbal in his Musnad has recorded the same tradition at four places but even for once he has not mentioned this addition. (Vol. 1, Pg. 377, 430, 448)
The renowned scholar of Ahle-Sunnah and reliable traditionalists of fifth century HafizAbu Noaim Isfahan! has recorded the traditions regarding Hazrat Mahdi (A.S.) from very reliable sources in his book Manaqibul-Mahdi. He has narrated this tradition from 31 different channels with the exception of Zaedas narration. Not a single tradition included the added phrase. This phrase is narrated only by Zaeda. (Ref. Al-Bayan Fi-Akhbare-Sa.hibiz Zaman, at the end of first chapter Pg. 94-96). It is undoubtedly proved that Zaeda, as his name implies has added the so-called phrase. But it is deplorable to note that Abu Daud has ignored other reliable channels of narration and has opted to choose only the narration of Zaeda. Some other scholars of Ahle-Sunnah too have benefited from this fabricated tradition. Albeit, the author of Iqdud-Durar has quoted this tradition from Sunane-Abi-Daud but did not record this addition. On this basis it can be concluded that the versions of Sunane-Abi- Daud must have been tampered with (particularly after the seventh century) or correctors must have added the phrase on their own accord while verifying. Apart from this the acclaimed traditionalists ofAhle-Sun-nah, who have a deep dexterity and expertise in sitting and sorting out the traditions have objected to this tradition vociferously. Some of them are Hafiz Ganji Shafei in Al-Bayan Fi-Akhbare-Sahibiz Zaman, Khwaja Mohammad Parsa Hanafi (exp.866)
in the footnotes of Faslul-Khitab and Ihn Talha Shafei in Ghayatus-Sol. They all have unanimously regarded it as weak, unreliable, discontinuous and contradictory to correct traditions.
The reason for this tradition of Zaeda being fabricated are those authentic and continuous tradi-tions in which the name of Hazrat Mahdis (A.S.) father is mentioned as Hasan. The below given tradition is quoted as an example.
The accredited traditionalist of Ahle-Sunnah Abu Noaim Isfahan! narrates from a veteran inter-preter Ibn Khashaah wlio relates from Imam Alt Reza (A.S.) that:
The Mahdi is the pious son of Hasan Askari. Such traditions are also found in Faraedus-Simtain (Chap. 35, 73)
4. The Doyen ofTraditionalists of Ahle-Sunnah Abu Daud, whose book is among the much respected Sehah-e-Sittah narrates one tradition from Abu Ishaq who quoted Hazrat Ali (A.S.) and who related that Hazrat Mohammad (S.A.) said while looking at Imam Hasan (A.S.) :
This son of mine is the chief - one of his descendants will bear the name of your Prophet.
Some of the great Sunni scholars like the ideological guide and Leader of Wahabis, Ibn Qayyim Jauzi in AI-Munar-Al-Munif, Sehudi (exp. 911),Ibn Kathir in Al-Fitan wal-Malahim and Ihn Hajar in Sawaeq have quoted this tradition profusely in their respective books and have regarded Imam Mahdi (A.S.) from the lineage of Imam Hasan (A.S.) on the ground.sthat since a person from his lineage will avenge this humiliation hence he had signed the truce.
But even this tradition is fabricated and distorted as the earlier ones. As can be seen from the following facts :
(a) Same tradition is quoted by the author of Iqdud-Dunir from the same chain of narrators from Sunane Abi Daud but instead of phrase he looked towards his son Hasan* the author has indicated he looked towards his son Husain. Perhaps the scribe must have written Hasan instead of Husain. Those who are experienced in this field will realise that this possibility does exist.
(b) There are innumerable traditions which have continuously stated that Imam Mahdi (A.S.) will be the descendant of Imam Husain (A.S.). Hence according to the science of traditions if one lone tradition is contradictory to numerous continuous (Mutawatir) traditions then this tradition will not be taken into consideration. Ibn Hajar has related from Hazrat
Ali (A.S.) in his book As-Sawaequl-Muharreqa on Pg. No. 165 that :
The world will not perish unless a man, from the progeny of my son Husain, will not rise who will fill the earth with justice as it was fraught with injustice.
Muhibuddeen-e-Tahari in Zakhaerul-Uqhaon Pg. 136 has narratedfrom Huzaifa Yamani who re-lated from the Holy Prophet (S.A.) that:
If a single day remains from the age of this world then Almighty will prolong that day to such an extent that one of my sons will appear, whose name will be as mine.
Hazrat Salman inquired : From the progeny of which son? The Holy Prophet (S.A.) placed his hand on Imam Husain (A.S.) and said :
From the progeny of this son.
(c) If despite these two narrations we accept the tradition of Abu Daud even then the point is not against us. Because Imam Baqir (A.S.) is the first grandson of Imam Husain (A.S.) and the second grandson of Imam Hasan (A.S.). His mother was Fatema, the daughter of Imam Hasan (A.S.). Hence Imam Mahdi (A.S.) is the son of Imam Hasan (A.S.) as well as Imam Husain (A.S.). Hilali relates that once the Holy Prophet (S.A.) consoled his daughter Hazrat Fatema (S.A.) in these words :
The two sons of this nation are your sons Hasan and Husain, who descend from me. They are the chiefs of the youth of Paradise. By Allah, their parents are superior to them. 0 Fatema ! by Allah the Mahdi of this nation will be the descendant of both of them.
(d) Keeping these facts in mind that it is a lone tradition which is contradictory to other several continuous traditions, also there may he a possibility of error in script. This becomes crystal clear that it is not an authentic tradition particularly when the historical facts are contrary to the tradition. The reason is that those who are attributed as Mahdi, among them is the grandson ofImam Hasan (A.S.), Moham-mad bin Abdullah known as Nafse-Zakiyya. Bani Abhass campaign attributed him to be Mahdi so as to earn the sympathy of masses and take undue advantage of this belief which is deep-rooted in their hearts and thus topple the reign of Bani Umayya. They publicized and promoted his name and first thing they did was that they added his fathers name is same as that of my father (as it was hinted in the discussion on third tradition), since the name of this Mahdis father was Abdullah. Then for dispelling further doubts they falsely claimed that Mahdi is (lie descendant of Imam Hasan (A.S.), because Moham-mad bin Abdullah descended from the lineage of Imam Hasan (A.S.).
Then for consolidating their position they fabricated another tradition from the mouth of Abu Huraira that there was a stammering in the speech of Imam Mahdi (A.S.) (Ref. Maqatilut-Talebin) because Mohammad bin Ahdullah had stammering in his tongue. Finally Bani Abbas succeeded in grabbing power, by deriving undue advantage from this belief and intimidating their masses. When they got absolute control then they killed the same Mahdi and his father and again spread the news that Nafse-Zakiyyah who would be killed before the Mahdi is slained and the reappearance of Mahdi has drawn nigh. Imam Jafar Sadiq (A.S.) had predicted about each and every event long back. (Maqatilut-Talebeen, Pg. 141-142, Al-Adabus-Sul-taniyyah Fakhri Pg. 16 has mentioned everything in detail.)The embezzlement and meddling of Bani Abbas are not limited to politics or ethics. But they have not even spared the interpretations of Quranic verses and traditions. The details of which shall be given later in another article.
But those who commit such despicable embezzlement, distort the religion of Allah, make additions in the tradition of Holy Prophet (S.A.) or ascribe false things to him and record such baseless things in their books, which misguide the simpletons and ordinary believers; are they not among those who are condemned in this verse :
Surely those who conceal such clear evidences and guidance which we have revealed and clarified in the book for the people, they are cursed by Allah and the curse of cursors be upon them.
Share this article