Hijab

Undoubtedly, in this age of ours - which some have named as the ‘age of nudity and sexual freedom’ and in which, West-stricken individuals regard wantonness of women as being part of this freedom - the mention of hijaab is very disconcerting for this group and at times is even looked upon as a myth associated with the ancient times!

However, the innumerable evils and the ever-increasing problems arising out of this unconditioned freedom have gradually resulted in this concept being viewed with a greater interest.

Of course, in the Islamic and religious environments - especially in Iran after the revolution - a great number of issues have been clarified and sufficient and satisfactory answers to most of these questions have been provided, practically; nevertheless, the significance of the topic demands this issue to be discussed more comprehensively.

The issue under discussion is:  Should women (with due apologies) be placed at the disposal of all men for the purpose of being exploited by them by way of sight, hearing and touch (excepting sexual intercourse), or should these benefits be the sole prerogative of their respective husbands?

The point of debate is that should women continue to remain entangled in a never-ending competition in flaunting their bodies and stirring up the physical and carnal desires of men, or should these issues be uprooted from the social environment and restricted to the familial and matrimonial milieu?

Islam advocates the second plan and hijaab can be looked upon as a part of this agenda, whereas the Westerners and the licentious West-stricken ones support the first program!

Islam avers that all physical pleasures - sexual intercourse and those derived by means of sight, hearing and touch - are specific to the husbands, and anything beyond this is a sin and leads to pollution and impurity within the society.

The philosophy behind hijaab is not something that is hidden and concealed since:

1. Nudity of women, which is quite naturally accompanied by adornment and coquettishness, puts men, especially the youths, in a state of perpetual stimulation - a stimulation which affects their nerves, generates within them pathological nervous excitement and at times even brings about psychological disorders.  There is a limit to the burden of excitement which the human nerves can endure.  Don’t all the psychologists caution that perpetual excitement leads to disorders and diseases?

Especially in view of the fact that the sexual impulse is the strongest and the most profound of all impulses within man and, all through the ages, has been the cause of destructive events and horrendous offenses, to the extent that people have gone on to say:  You shall not come across any important event (in history), except that a woman has played a part in it!

Is the continuous provocation of this impulse by means of nudity, and intensifying it, not tantamount to playing with fire?  Is this act wise and prudent?

Islam desires that the Muslim men and women should possess a soul that is calm, nerves that are composed, and eyes and ears that are pure, and this is one of the philosophies of hijaab.

2. Substantiated and conclusive statistics reveal that with the rise in nudity, the world has correspondingly witnessed a continuous rise in divorces and matrimonial separations.  This is because “whatever the eyes see, the heart covets”; and whatever the heart (which here means the errant and wild desires) covets, it seeks to obtain it, whatever be the cost.  And so, every new day the heart gets attracted to one and bids adieu to another.

In an environment where hijaab is prevalent (together with adherence to the other Islamic conditions), the husband and wife belong to each other and their sentiments, love and feelings are exclusively for one another.

But in the ‘free market of nudity’ wherein women have been practically transformed into a commodity of mutual use - (at least in issues other than sexual intercourse) - the sanctity of a matrimonial alliance becomes meaningless, and families, similar to a spider’s web, swiftly break apart and the children are left without guardians.

3. The increase in indecency and obscenity, and the escalation in the number of illegitimate children are the most painful consequences of non-observance of hijaab – a fact which, in our opinion, does not require any figures and statistics; and the reasons for this, especially in the Western society, are so very apparent so as to eliminate the need for any mention.

We do not say that that non-observance of hijaab is the sole and fundamental cause for obscenities and illegitimate children, nor do we say that ignoble colonialism and destructive political issues have not had any contribution in it; rather, what we wish to state is that the issue of nudity and non-observance of hijaab is as one of the instrumental and effective factors for those evils.

And in view of the fact that ‘indecency’, and worse than this, the ‘illegitimate children’ were, and are, the sources of various crimes in human societies, the dangerous dimension of this issue becomes all the more lucid.

When we hear that, according to statistics, in the United Kingdom five hundred thousand illegitimate children are born every year and then when we hear that a group of British intellectuals have issued a warning to those in the echelons of power with respect to this ongoing trend - not motivated out of ethical and religious concerns but rather out of concern for the dangers these illegitimate children pose to the safety and security of the society, to the extent that their involvement is observed in numerous of the criminal dossiers - we completely perceive the gravity of the issue.  We (also) come to realize that even those, who possess scant respect for religion or ethical issues, consider the issue of spread of indecency to be catastrophic.  Thus, every thing that serves to increase the sphere of physical immorality in human societies is a threat for their safety and security, and the consequences – in whatever manner we may compute them - shall always be to their detriment.

Studies on the part of educative scholars reveal that reduction of work, backwardness and lack of responsibility are most noticeably perceived in schools, which are co-educational in nature and centers, where males and females work together in an ambience of licentiousness and free abandon.

4. The issue of ‘obscenity of women’ and ‘humiliation of their personalities’ also possesses great importance and which requires no statistics to prove.  When a society desires a woman with a bare body, it is quite obvious that day by day, it would demand increased beautification and augmented ostentation from her.  In a society wherein a woman, due to her physical attraction, is utilized for promotion and publicity of products, as an ornamentation for the reception rooms, a tool for attracting the tourists and the like, her personality is reduced to that of a doll or a trivial and insignificant item, and her lofty human values are totally thrust into oblivion; ultimately, her only distinction and glory lies in her youth, beauty and self-exhibition.

Thus, she is transformed into a tool for satisfying the carnal desires of a handful of individuals, who are polluted, deceptive and possess satanic attributes!

In such a society how is it possible for a woman to manifest herself in the light of her knowledge, awareness, sagacity and moral traits, and come to occupy a lofty rank and status?

It is indeed painful that in the Western and the West-stricken countries, and in our country (too) before the Islamic Revolution, the maximum prominence, fame, repute, money, income and standing had been for the polluted and promiscuous women, who had come to acquire renown as ‘artists and performers’.  Wherever they would go, the management of this polluted environment would scramble after them to welcome their presence!

Praise be to God that the entire apparatus was annihilated and the female sex emerged from her previous triteness and her erstwhile standing as a cultural doll and an insignificant item, and salvaged her personality.  She took for herself the veil without being secluded and isolated, presenting herself in every expedient and constructive arena of the society - even the battlefield - with the same veil and hijaab.