Rafed English
site.site_name : Rafed English

Here, regardless of emotion, it must be stated that Fatima (peace be upon her) was oppressed, and there was no intention to win Allah’s pleasure in the Caliphs’ act, because:

-Abubakr recited “Maasher ul-Anbia” Hadith, and it was not authentic, and there was no record for it, because it was contradicted by the verses of the holy Quran. But, on the other side, Fatima, Ali, and Omme Aiman’s witness was not accepted.

-Not accepting Fatima’s speech, Abubakr accused her of mendacity and ignored the Tathir (purification) verse of the holy Quran.

-If it is true that the prophets do not leave anything as heritage, why Ayesheh, Abubakr’s daughter, usurped the Prophet’s chamber and even did not let Imam Hasan’s corpse be buried near the tomb of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his descendants)?

-What happened that they did not listen to Ali’s speech, but listened to Ayesheh?

Adapted from the book: "Fatima (a.s) The Most Paramount Lady of Islam" by: "Dr. Ali Ghaemi"